Most of you are likely familiar with the folding panels of an A-liner and its cousins. Maybe this has already been attempted with tc's commercialy?
Edited by crumbs, 14 March 2017 - 08:08 PM.
Posted 14 March 2017 - 03:04 PM
Edited by crumbs, 14 March 2017 - 08:08 PM.
2wd Looking for a New Puma Shell 78" wide with a 60" interior closed height.
Posted 14 March 2017 - 03:07 PM
Check the Alaskan forum. They use hard panels.
Posted 14 March 2017 - 03:08 PM
2wd Looking for a New Puma Shell 78" wide with a 60" interior closed height.
Posted 14 March 2017 - 03:14 PM
I believe the cab over portion uses folding panels.
2 main reasons for a pop-up. Low profile, weight reduction. The point of campers like the FWC and ATC is to keep weight as light as possible while still providing basic amenities. That tends to dictate construction methods somewhat. Solid panels would add weight up high. They would also require storage for the panels in an already limited space.
Over the years I've seen several tow behind pop ups with solid panels. Most of them have had leak issues over the years.
Edited by Squatch, 14 March 2017 - 03:20 PM.
Posted 14 March 2017 - 03:26 PM
Edited by crumbs, 14 March 2017 - 03:38 PM.
2wd Looking for a New Puma Shell 78" wide with a 60" interior closed height.
Posted 14 March 2017 - 06:28 PM
Posted 14 March 2017 - 07:18 PM
2wd Looking for a New Puma Shell 78" wide with a 60" interior closed height.
Posted 14 March 2017 - 08:20 PM
We understand. That's how Alaskan does it for the cab over section. Look close at the pics in this thread.
http://www.wanderthe...kan-2016-55-co/
Posted 14 March 2017 - 08:53 PM
2wd Looking for a New Puma Shell 78" wide with a 60" interior closed height.
Posted 16 March 2017 - 03:04 AM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users