There's a famous salmon spawning area we used to visit every few years in the fall. Over time the crowds got bigger and the runs got smaller so we stopped going, and prob won't ever go back. One could attribute the declines to a number of causes. I think CC would have to be included. Any angler with some years on the coast could relate a similar story. But the point here is, for us the window for that trip has closed, no need to plan for it anymore.
One day we'd like to roadtrip to Newfoundland and Labrador. Thanks to coverage the last few years about iceberg ally we'll now plan the trip and it's timing to include a visit to that area in the hopes of seeing some bergs near the shoreline. I don't expect the icebergs to disappear anytime soon but I'm not going to wait 20 yrs to go - because of my concerns over CC and how the viewing opportunity might be changed.
Any gardener with a few decades on the coast could tell you local CC has effected plant growth patterns. Likewise a lay person with a memory of the leaf life cycle periods of local tree's, including drought stresses.
Our future trips to the east to see fall colours and to the north to see spring break up on a big northern river will have to be timed for success. Nothing new there, just that now I have to give extra weighting to how recent the data is.
We do what we can travel wise, but we can't just travel any time. Like most folks I expect, we have to prioritise things, have a budget etc. We usually submit requests in Oct for time off in the following year so do need to make some make some guesses about conditions
But for us its not about the firmness of predictions. I'm old enough to be able to simply look at changes in my lifetime to expect the future will be different from the present.
The trick has always been seeing and doing what we want, while we can, CC has added another element to the challenge.