Jump to content


Photo

I took the plunge.


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 Shadyapex

Shadyapex

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 203 posts
  • LocationBishop, CA

Posted 19 January 2016 - 03:44 AM

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR Lens

So I was lurking on ebay hoping to find a good deal on an older super tele for wildlife shooting and found a Nikkor AI-S 500 f/4 for $1300 ending in 3 hours with no bids on it. So I headed over the kenrockwell.com to see if he had anything to say about this particular 30+ year old lens and found a rave review of the 200-500 zoom, for the same money. B&H reviews confirmed the enthusiastic response. I know it's a stop slower but it has VR, modern optics, is a zoom, and is brand new. It's supposed to arrive on Thursday, 1/21, and I know where I'll be that afternoon. It's also not $6000.


Edited by Shadyapex, 19 January 2016 - 03:45 AM.

  • 0

"It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one."


#2 Lighthawk

Lighthawk

    Weekend warrior

  • Members
  • 3,318 posts
  • LocationNevada City, CA

Posted 19 January 2016 - 03:51 AM

Congrats on the big glass!  With all the raptors we see in the upper Owens Valley, I'm looking forward to seeing some cool bird shots.  

Sort of off topic, but do you see elk in the Owens?


  • 0

2021 RAM 3500 Crew 4x4, 6.4 hemi/8 speed trans with 4.10 gears, Timber Grove bags, Falken Wildpeak 35" tires.

OEV Aluma 6.75 flatbed, Bundutec Odyssey camper on order for 2024

For this year we're still using our 2008 FWC Hawk with victron DC-DC charger, 130w solar, MPPT controler

with 2000w inverter and external 120v output and 12v solar input with 100w portable solar.   http://lighthawkphoto.com


#3 Wandering Sagebrush

Wandering Sagebrush

    Free Range Human

  • Site Team
  • 10,532 posts
  • LocationNortheast Oregon

Posted 19 January 2016 - 03:57 AM

Congrats! I think you will like the 200-500/5.6. if you can keep your shutter above 1/1500, VR isn't needed. The modern coatings make a real difference in the super tele world. My experiment with a 600/4 AI S told me that old telephotos were not that great with digital cameras. Tons of chromatic aberration.

Let us know what you think of the new lens.
  • 0

I am haunted by waters


#4 Shadyapex

Shadyapex

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 203 posts
  • LocationBishop, CA

Posted 19 January 2016 - 04:32 AM

I've been doing a lot of bird photography recently (and posted some in the wildlife forum) with an old AI-S 300 f/4.5 and am so looking forward to the new kit, and yes, I'm shooting at 1/1200 or more. Some of the reviews on B&H sound a little far fetched regarding slow shutter speeds with the VR but we'll see what I can do with it.

We do have elk, the most common places to see them are around Big Pine, particularly just south of town on the west side of the road. There's a wildlife viewing sign there and it's not uncommon to see them out in that field.


  • 1

"It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one."


#5 ski3pin

ski3pin

    Belay On

  • Site Team
  • 15,251 posts
  • LocationSierra Nevada Range

Posted 19 January 2016 - 05:02 AM

Congrats on the new lens!
  • 0

2003 Ford Ranger FX4 Level II 2013 ATC Bobcat SE "And in the end, it's not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years."- Abraham Lincoln  http://ski3pin.blogspot.com/


#6 Happyjax

Happyjax

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,442 posts
  • LocationMaryland

Posted 19 January 2016 - 04:54 PM

I have the new Nikon 80-400 which cost me $2700 + tax. This lens is supposed to rival it. I am curious to see if it does. Looking forward to your pictures.

 

BTW Thom Hogan (http://www.bythom.com/ )

 

or Nasim Mansurov ( https://photographylife.com/ ) are much better resources than the one you mentioned....


  • 1

2018 Ford F-250. Customized Bundutec Sable :)


#7 Shadyapex

Shadyapex

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 203 posts
  • LocationBishop, CA

Posted 19 January 2016 - 07:07 PM

I have the new Nikon 80-400 which cost me $2700 + tax. This lens is supposed to rival it. I am curious to see if it does. Looking forward to your pictures.

 

BTW Thom Hogan (http://www.bythom.com/ )

 

or Nasim Mansurov ( https://photographylife.com/ ) are much better resources than the one you mentioned....

Hey thanks for the resource links. I'll post some pics once I've had a chance to get used to the lens. Steve,,,,,,


  • 1

"It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one."


#8 Wandering Sagebrush

Wandering Sagebrush

    Free Range Human

  • Site Team
  • 10,532 posts
  • LocationNortheast Oregon

Posted 19 January 2016 - 10:58 PM

One more vote for Thom Hogan's reviews. I find him very objective.
  • 1

I am haunted by waters


#9 Shadyapex

Shadyapex

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 203 posts
  • LocationBishop, CA

Posted 22 January 2016 - 10:55 PM

Well, the lens came yesterday afternoon so you can guess what I've been doing. So far I'm very impressed. The VR is fantastic, the AF is pretty fast and doesn't hunt too much although I have missed a couple of shots because of it. Of course the subject was pretty far away in a cluttered background and flying so I wasn't too surprised. And it's pretty big, the whole rig just barely fits in the Mindshift Gear holster which is the largest one I could find at B&H. Here are a couple of shots.
All are cropped a little, no sharpening.
p1671974243-5.jpg

p1808525853-5.jpg

p1842883766-5.jpg

Edited by Shadyapex, 22 January 2016 - 10:58 PM.

  • 0

"It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one."


#10 alano

alano

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 255 posts
  • LocationSilicon Valley

Posted 22 January 2016 - 11:35 PM

Those are some sweet bird photos. The new glass agrees with you. I particularly like the heron in flight. Always a challenge with something moving so fast.

 

Alan


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users