Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Hawk vs Grandby


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 SDJeff

SDJeff

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 18 posts
  • LocationSan Diego

Posted 22 June 2010 - 07:33 AM

Hello,

I am a newbie who decided to stop lurking, get some info and buy a FWC. I am really excited and appreciate the great information I am finding here.

I am trying to decide between a hawk n a grandly. My plan is to put the camper on a 05 or 06 Tundra which I would purchase. I don't anticipate needing to tow. I do go off road a lot - I live for visiting remote places! I would like the extra room of a grandby (and I suspect my girlfriend would even more), especially bc I could get a bed configuration to allow us to sleep parallel with the truck (I think this will be big with her). However, the hawk seems like a better fit for the truck. Questions: 1) How big of a deal would center of gravity issues really be with a long bed camper on a tundra? I know some people say it is ok. Has anyone tried it and felt that it was a problem? Does anybody have experience with both a hawk and grandby to give me an idea what the difference would really be? 2) What suspension mods would I need w/the grandby compared to the hawk? Are air bags alone enough? 3) I don't care about the tailgate getting dirty (one concern I saw mentioned) but do people encounter problems with turning radius or the gate/camper hitting when offroad with a grandby on a shortbed? 4) Is it any better if I got an access cab vs a double cab? 5) Anything else I should be concerned about?

Please excuse me if this is redundant with past threads, but I wanted to hear peoples most recent experience and didn't find all these exact questions on past threads. Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Jeff
  • 0
2006 Hawk on 2011 Ford F-250 2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser "Freedom begins between the ears." Edward Abbey

#2 Barko1

Barko1

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,635 posts
  • LocationSouthern Appalachians

Posted 22 June 2010 - 01:52 PM

If you like remote and have a Toyota then Grandby would be a bit much IMHO.
  • 0
Granby on an F250 in S. NM

#3 chnlisle

chnlisle

    Post Master

  • Members
  • 3,811 posts
  • LocationThe Old Pueblo

Posted 22 June 2010 - 02:40 PM

Welcome,
Just my 2 cents but even the Hawk is gong to tax the Toyota's suspension on rough roads. If you've been reading you see that even the guys with Ford & Chevy half tons have done suspension mods. And a few are pretty extensive.
Good luck.
  • 0

Special Engel Pricing For WTW Members

Click here to see my ATC Cougar
JayAronowSales.com
(520)579-9610
jayaronow@gmail.com


#4 mtn-high

mtn-high

    Campground Host- FUNKYTOWN

  • Members
  • 954 posts
  • LocationHoward, CO

Posted 23 June 2010 - 12:12 PM

The Tundra/Hawk is a very popular combo.

I have a combo of Supersprings and Timbrens on my truck and am completely happy with the way it handles/drives/rides/fits.

It works here because I don't haul massive amounts of alcohol on my trips. DD and the other guys NEED that extra payload!

YMMV. Best of luck

mtn
  • 0
Wherever ya go...there ya are.

#5 billharr

billharr

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,824 posts
  • LocationStockton CA

Posted 23 June 2010 - 01:07 PM

2005 Tundra TRD with 2002 Hawk. Added air bags and sway bar works great for me.

Bill
  • 0

#6 Kilroy

Kilroy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 192 posts

Posted 24 June 2010 - 03:21 AM

I had a Hawk on my Tundra. If I would have had a Granby I probably would still have it, wife who insisted on Hawk is now an ex.. Now have a 10' Alaskan on 1 ton Dodge diesel. Room is great, but miss the lightness on FWC.

Storage is always a big issue when camping, but a big plus for me with the Granby would have been the more comfortable inside seating.

Airbags on Tundra worked great, and continue to do so 4 years later. (Still have truck.) I think the adaptability of the airbags is just too good. Started out with Roadmaster helper springs. After two years they started to sag. Thats when I went to airbags.
  • 0
David Bybee 2004.5 Dodge 3500 4x4 diesel 2004 Tundra DC 1998 Alaskan 10' Cabover

#7 Country Doc

Country Doc

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts

Posted 24 June 2010 - 03:52 AM

I had a Hawk on my Tundra. If I would have had a Granby I probably would still have it, wife who insisted on Hawk is now an ex.. Now have a 10' Alaskan on 1 ton Dodge diesel. Room is great, but miss the lightness on FWC.

Storage is always a big issue when camping, but a big plus for me with the Granby would have been the more comfortable inside seating.

Airbags on Tundra worked great, and continue to do so 4 years later. (Still have truck.) I think the adaptability of the airbags is just too good. Started out with Roadmaster helper springs. After two years they started to sag. Thats when I went to airbags.


Just curious, how is the seating "more comfortable" in the Grandby? My understanding is that the interior layout is identical, just the extra 16" of "storage cabinet" to the right of the door in the Grandby as you walk in, and to the left of the settee at the front left. No difference in the seats/couch/beds/etc.

dc
  • 0

#8 SDJeff

SDJeff

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 18 posts
  • LocationSan Diego

Posted 26 June 2010 - 09:39 PM

Thank you very much to everyone who replied. I appreciate the information.
I will also try and keep in mind the issues of weight related to recreational liquids!
  • 0
2006 Hawk on 2011 Ford F-250 2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser "Freedom begins between the ears." Edward Abbey

#9 Lighthawk

Lighthawk

    Weekend warrior

  • Members
  • 3,319 posts
  • LocationNevada City, CA

Posted 27 June 2010 - 01:06 AM

This is really good info for me too. I've just acquired an 06 Tundra Access 4WD and have similar goals as SDJeff.
Seems like hanging an eight foot camper out of my six foot four inch bed would defeat the off road capabilities I'm trying to retain. Good info on the Timbrens and other mods. Definitely need to have some payload for liquid refreshments!

BTW the used Hawk in Sacramento shows an 'old style' width of 59 3/4" inches but apparently only the newer Hawks will fit a Tundra. Still learning what will actually fit. I also agree with SD that sleeeping parallel to the truck is the way to go. So what is the best model for this? Slide out bed for sure, but at least six feet long.

Andy



Thank you very much to everyone who replied. I appreciate the information.
I will also try and keep in mind the issues of weight related to recreational liquids!


  • 0

2021 RAM 3500 Crew 4x4, 6.4 hemi/8 speed trans with 4.10 gears, Timber Grove bags, Falken Wildpeak 35" tires.

OEV Aluma 6.75 flatbed, Bundutec Odyssey camper on order for 2024

For this year we're still using our 2008 FWC Hawk with victron DC-DC charger, 130w solar, MPPT controler

with 2000w inverter and external 120v output and 12v solar input with 100w portable solar.   http://lighthawkphoto.com


#10 Idahojolson

Idahojolson

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 27 posts
  • LocationIdaho (ID)

Posted 30 December 2020 - 06:46 PM

Just curious, how is the seating "more comfortable" in the Grandby? My understanding is that the interior layout is identical, just the extra 16" of "storage cabinet" to the right of the door in the Grandby as you walk in, and to the left of the settee at the front left. No difference in the seats/couch/beds/etc.

dc


I’d love to know the answer to this comment. I thought the 16” were in the dinette seating area. Anyone know?
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users