Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Truck Payload Capacity


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 JAW

JAW

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts

Posted 05 November 2007 - 03:56 PM

I have 2003 Tundra TRD 4x4. I am a little concerned with my payload capacity (note -not the same as towing capacity) with a ATC/FWC if I were to buy one. The book says I have 1560lbs payload inlcluding occupants and luggage - so lets do the math.
Camper - 700lbs dry
5gallon water- 50lbs
full cooler - 50lbs
camper accesories - 100lbs (luggage rack,fridge,furnace etc.
propane - 30lbs
2 -adults - 350lbs (being generous) (with me an 3 of my hunting buddies easily looking at 800lbs total occumpants and that's before the bacon,eggs and pancakes for breaky)
2 - kids - 200lbs
Labrador - 70lbs
Luggage/camping gear for family - 100lbs
Already at a total of 1650 lbs so far and I still want the option pull a 18' aluminum fishing boat (tongue weight unknown), perhaps take a generator if I want or a chainsaw, or put a small car-topper boat on top with a 4hours outboard.
There seems to be a lot of Tundra's running these campers, but I am thinking that if I want to run in the 80%-90% range of capacity rather than be maxed out most of the time I need something that approaches the 2000lb range of payload. Does this mean I need to go to a 3/4 ton?

other camping gear
  • 0

#2 HERR42

HERR42

    01110010110101

  • Members
  • 797 posts
  • LocationSacramento, Ca

Posted 05 November 2007 - 04:27 PM

it does not come out too good does it?
  • 0
Jeff Herr WW6L '07 Hawk & '00 F250 SuperDuty CrewCab, Warn 12K, BFG AT KO 'E' rated, TransferFlow 48Gal tank

#3 JAW

JAW

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts

Posted 05 November 2007 - 04:48 PM

What is the payload of your F250 and is it enough do you find.
  • 0

#4 marc

marc

    Fire Proof

  • Members
  • 1,121 posts
  • LocationSouth Shores California

Posted 06 November 2007 - 02:56 AM

Jaw,

I have a F350 with a GVWR of 11100 lb.'s This gives me roughly 4100 lb.'s of payload.

Marc
  • 0

2016 Sprinter Silver Gray 144 Std. Roof 4x4. 3.0 diesle, Cooper "Dicoverer" ST Maxx 255/85/16


#5 HERR42

HERR42

    01110010110101

  • Members
  • 797 posts
  • LocationSacramento, Ca

Posted 06 November 2007 - 03:42 PM

i would have to look up the specs again.
the crew cab has the least payload of all the configurations.

in any event yes i think that I am within limits when fully loaded....but with not much safety margin.

I replaced the 26G tank with a 48G from "transfer-flow" upon purchase. So with that filled, plus 20G of water in the Hawk's tank and another four in the water heater and all the other "stuff" i am ok.

but, i am still entertaining a leaf spring add-on to elevate the bed just a couple of inches.
if i had a good level spot i would get out a ruler and take some measurements. i think the rear sags just a bit. Oh yes, and i know that the factory overload leafs contact their "bumper" when going over speedbumps etc.
  • 0
Jeff Herr WW6L '07 Hawk & '00 F250 SuperDuty CrewCab, Warn 12K, BFG AT KO 'E' rated, TransferFlow 48Gal tank

#6 JAW

JAW

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts

Posted 06 November 2007 - 06:31 PM

Did a little research and some kicking tires. Might go to a Silverado 2500HD crew cab short box 4x4. Seller told me payload is 3000lbs plus which is well within the range I need. 2000lbs would be sufficient but it seems if you want anything above the 1600lb range one has to make the jump from a 1/2 ton to a 3/4 ton. Probably look at a lift kit and air bags to get to be more off-road. Really like my Tundra, thought I would have it forever but needs have changed.
  • 0

#7 Kilroy

Kilroy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 192 posts

Posted 07 November 2007 - 03:45 AM

I believe the new Tundra has a higher load capacity.

I'm sure the load capacity's listed for trucks is already a "safe" number that includes a margin for safety. They couldn't take a chance on liability risks by having a truck loaded to stated capacity just short of being overloaded.
  • 0

#8 JAW

JAW

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts

Posted 07 November 2007 - 09:42 PM

I checked out the new Tundra. It seems that although the new 07 Tundra has a lot more power (towing capacity) it actually has less payload capacity than my 03. According to the 07 specs. a 4x4 TRD Access cab short box is now 1380 lbs. My 03, as I said before is listed at 1560 lbs.
  • 0

#9 brett13

brett13

    Lovecock

  • Members
  • 1,026 posts

Posted 08 November 2007 - 12:04 AM

Having the '07 Tundra, I am very comfortable that is is under-rated in payload (3" sag at hitch and plently of room to stops with 1600+lbs; handles great, feels safe, brakes and corners awesome). However, the boat you mentioned would put you even further over the posted specs than I would be comfortable with.
  • 0
Once had 2007 Tundra TRD 4x4 5.7 SR5 w/ Firestone bags, Bilstein 5100s in front, Total Chaos shackles rear, 275/70/18 E rated Michelin LTX AT2
2007 ATC Bobcat for sale

Now, just roaming around in a stock Land Cruiser (not stock for long though... bawahahha [evil laugh])

#10 Mark W. Ingalls

Mark W. Ingalls

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,248 posts
  • LocationHouston, TX

Posted 08 November 2007 - 02:54 PM

(Having recently suffered much at the hands of someone who decided to use the legal system against me, I hope you all will take this comment for what it's worth...)

In court, it's not so much what might seem reasonable, as what is proscribed. If you overload your vehicle and are involved in an accident, lawyers may use that choice, however reasonable it may seem to you, to their advantage. The deeper are your pockets, the greater is their advantage.

Caveat lector!
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users