I bought a Hawk this past year. So far I've absolutely loved it. No complaints.
However, I have found that there are moments when I really miss the utility of my truck bed (and my tailgate, funny enough).
I am a fairly spartan, no-frills camper, who doesn't need much in the way of interior comforts, and who typically just throws tubs of gear into the truck and hits the road.
So my mind has started drifting towards the Project M.
Has anyone moved to a PM after having had a slide-in camper? I'd be curious to hear some of the pros and cons.
I am a little leery of the PM, simply because it's a newer model. I know initially there were some design issues that were being worked out. I hate to sell something like a Hawk, which is so time-tested, to get a newer model that maybe hasn't had all its kinks worked out.
One of my favorite aspects of FWCs is their reputation for reliability and ruggedness. Does anyone know if the PMs are expected to be similarly tough, with similar expectations for longevity? I know FWC isn't building them to have them fall apart in two years, but I am not familiar enough with pop-up shells to know how durable they typically are.
So anyway, just wanted to see if there's anyone out there who could chime in with reasons to stick with the Hawk, or reasons to switch to a Project M. Thanks for any insight!
However, I have found that there are moments when I really miss the utility of my truck bed (and my tailgate, funny enough).
I am a fairly spartan, no-frills camper, who doesn't need much in the way of interior comforts, and who typically just throws tubs of gear into the truck and hits the road.
So my mind has started drifting towards the Project M.
Has anyone moved to a PM after having had a slide-in camper? I'd be curious to hear some of the pros and cons.
I am a little leery of the PM, simply because it's a newer model. I know initially there were some design issues that were being worked out. I hate to sell something like a Hawk, which is so time-tested, to get a newer model that maybe hasn't had all its kinks worked out.
One of my favorite aspects of FWCs is their reputation for reliability and ruggedness. Does anyone know if the PMs are expected to be similarly tough, with similar expectations for longevity? I know FWC isn't building them to have them fall apart in two years, but I am not familiar enough with pop-up shells to know how durable they typically are.
So anyway, just wanted to see if there's anyone out there who could chime in with reasons to stick with the Hawk, or reasons to switch to a Project M. Thanks for any insight!