Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Pett Vs. Wet


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#41 Accrete

Accrete

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 134 posts
  • LocationExploring the western, USA

Posted 14 October 2010 - 03:37 AM

way old thread but i'll chime in : )

My wife and i really appreciated the ease of the Thetford c402 cassette toilet, same unit utilized in the ER and X P Camper. The down side, not quite as bad as having to find a dump station... is that very third morning we would have to dump the cassette in an appropriate location such as a sani-hut in the national forest or similar.

In planning our next rig i am hoping the engineering/design can accomodate a "liquid seperating toilet" such as the AirHead. Two people full time you will only have to dispose of the dry-solids once a month. Liquids automaticaly separate into a 2 gallon container that can be disposed of easily.

in emergencies? we carry plastic bags and that gell stuff others have mentioned. works fine.
  • 0

Blogging from the WET! Coast of Oregon USA
2010 Chevy Express AWD Light Overland Vehicle
"You don't have to understand here, to be here." Charlie Crews


#42 DGS

DGS

    Member

  • Validating
  • PipPip
  • 16 posts
  • LocationNorth of Houston, Texas

Posted 14 October 2011 - 03:22 AM

Ok, even though the topic has probably been beat to death, I will keep this question short, mabey make it a poll?
What seems to be a better toilet and why, Pett style vs. porta potti's (the kind with liquid that you flush)?


We camp in a kamperoo tent trailer and use the Pett. It is easier to store in a limited space and we have addressed the high cost of bags/dry chemicals by using heavy duty kitchen bags and Poo Powder. After about 6 months of traveling North West Canada and Alaska it seem to work well, especially at night.
Dave
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users