Jump to content


Photo

Tundra with 4.7L engine


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 jcfly

jcfly

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 209 posts

Posted 09 January 2011 - 05:26 PM

Just starting to look at a replacement truck, and kinda like the look of the Tundra. I'm thinking a 2008 or so, and I'm wondering if their 4.7L engine has enough power with an FWC Hawk on it.

Anyone care to offer their opinion on this?
  • 0
Jim 2009 Chevy 2500 HD / 2004 FWC Hawk

#2 brett13

brett13

    Lovecock

  • Members
  • 1,026 posts

Posted 09 January 2011 - 05:48 PM

Just starting to look at a replacement truck, and kinda like the look of the Tundra. I'm thinking a 2008 or so, and I'm wondering if their 4.7L engine has enough power with an FWC Hawk on it.

Anyone care to offer their opinion on this?

The 4.7 is a great engine, having been around in Landcruisers and older Tundra for a while. I think it has enough power to do the job, but it will struggle a little. The new gen Tundra's get the same mileage with the 5.7 engine, so why give up the power?
  • 0
Once had 2007 Tundra TRD 4x4 5.7 SR5 w/ Firestone bags, Bilstein 5100s in front, Total Chaos shackles rear, 275/70/18 E rated Michelin LTX AT2
2007 ATC Bobcat for sale

Now, just roaming around in a stock Land Cruiser (not stock for long though... bawahahha [evil laugh])

#3 SunMan

SunMan

    King Taco

  • Members
  • 2,362 posts
  • LocationOxnard, CA.

Posted 09 January 2011 - 05:54 PM

Concur with Brett. The 4.7 in my 06 handles it just fine but why not go with the 5.7 with no effect on milage. More is better right?Posted Image
  • 0

Sunman
2003 Four Wheel Camper -Hawk

2023 All Terrain Camper - Panther 
2006 Toyota Tundra Double Cab Limited 4WD
2017 Toyota Tundra Double Cab Limited 4WD


#4 generubin

generubin

    Electric Baja

  • Members
  • 626 posts
  • LocationVentura, California

Posted 09 January 2011 - 06:40 PM

Or, while you are changing trucks, you might consider a 3/4 ton from Dodge, Chevy or Ford. The mileage will be about the same as the Toyot, even better with diesel, and you won't have to do any suspension mods which can be costly and sometimes problematic.
  • 0

From Baja to the Arctic and all places between!

www.generubinaudio.com

Dodge 4x4 2500 Cummins, 6 spd manual, ATC Ocelot Shell. Tesla Model S, 85KWH, 2018 Tesla Model 3 (3 of them!!)


#5 BSS

BSS

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 432 posts
  • LocationState of Jefferson

Posted 09 January 2011 - 07:48 PM

What Gene said.

I have an access cab 4.7l Tundra in addition to my Tacoma. While the temptation exists to buy a used hawk to put on it and gain a lot more room and comfort, the reality is I'm very skeptical that the motor and transmission would hold up over the long term. I think it's asking a bit much of that particular powertrain. In addition, I'd have to do a bunch of suspension upgrades (as with any half-ton truck and FWC,) and I'm not so sure I want to do all of that again.

And as you can see this comes from a long-time Toyota fan.
  • 0

#6 Lighthawk

Lighthawk

    Weekend warrior

  • Members
  • 3,319 posts
  • LocationNevada City, CA

Posted 09 January 2011 - 07:58 PM

Like Suni I've got 06 Tundra 4.7 with Hawk. Power seems ine but I did airbags/swaybar mods. As my daily ride w/o FWC I appreciate the reasonable size of the Toy for parking etc
  • 0

2021 RAM 3500 Crew 4x4, 6.4 hemi/8 speed trans with 4.10 gears, Timber Grove bags, Falken Wildpeak 35" tires.

OEV Aluma 6.75 flatbed, Bundutec Odyssey camper on order for 2024

For this year we're still using our 2008 FWC Hawk with victron DC-DC charger, 130w solar, MPPT controler

with 2000w inverter and external 120v output and 12v solar input with 100w portable solar.   http://lighthawkphoto.com


#7 leadsled9

leadsled9

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 935 posts
  • LocationLivermore, CA

Posted 09 January 2011 - 10:36 PM

Or, while you are changing trucks, you might consider a 3/4 ton from Dodge, Chevy or Ford.


I found the 4.7 left a lot to be desired once the camper was on the back.

X2 with the recommendation on going with a 3/4 ton of your favorite flavor. You and the camper will be MUCH happier.

If someone already has a 1/2 ton truck and wanted to put a camper on it....that set up would be ok.

Since you are are starting from scratch looking for a truck to put a camper on you might as well get one that can handle the load AND stop as well. Half ton brakes will be lacking with the additional weight of the camper. A 3/4 ton or even a 1 ton will be a much better choice.

Just my 2 cents worth from someone who's been there.....
  • 0

2010 Ford F250 4X4; 6.4 Powerstroke Diesel; Warn 16.5 winch; Airlift Springs; Transfer Flow 47 gal. fuel tank, BDS 4" lift kit, BDS dual steering stabilizer with upgraded Fox 2.0 shocks, Toyo 35X12.50X18 Open Country M/T tires, Pro Comp wheels;  2008 FWC Hawk Camper;  2000 Toyota Tundra.


#8 Barko1

Barko1

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,635 posts
  • LocationSouthern Appalachians

Posted 09 January 2011 - 11:06 PM

I found the 4.7 left a lot to be desired once the camper was on the back.

X2 with the recommendation on going with a 3/4 ton of your favorite flavor. You and the camper will be MUCH happier.

If someone already has a 1/2 ton truck and wanted to put a camper on it....that set up would be ok.

Since you are are starting from scratch looking for a truck to put a camper on you might as well get one that can handle the load AND stop as well. Half ton brakes will be lacking with the additional weight of the camper. A 3/4 ton or even a 1 ton will be a much better choice.

Just my 2 cents worth from someone who's been there.....


X2, I had my grandby on a 4.6 F150, just adequate. Put it on a 7.3 F250, better in all ways,just so much heftier, never a strain whereas I felt the F150 was always being worked and not just the motor but chsasis.
  • 0
Granby on an F250 in S. NM

#9 jcfly

jcfly

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 209 posts

Posted 11 January 2011 - 12:11 AM

OK, I'm convinced even though it's a bit tough finding an F250 at a reasonable price. The new ones are out of range altogether.

Thank you all for your replies!
  • 0
Jim 2009 Chevy 2500 HD / 2004 FWC Hawk

#10 generubin

generubin

    Electric Baja

  • Members
  • 626 posts
  • LocationVentura, California

Posted 11 January 2011 - 12:15 AM

Great choice on going full sized. Just be sure to do your research if you are choosing diesel. The Ford 6.0 was very problematic. If you are going diesel, you'll likely be happiest long term with a Dodge Cummins with a manual trans. It'll take you 300,000 miles+.
  • 0

From Baja to the Arctic and all places between!

www.generubinaudio.com

Dodge 4x4 2500 Cummins, 6 spd manual, ATC Ocelot Shell. Tesla Model S, 85KWH, 2018 Tesla Model 3 (3 of them!!)





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users